Professional in Human Resources (PHR) Practice Exam

The McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. case is significant in establishing that evidence of employee misconduct occurring after termination does not serve to absolve an employer of liability for wrongful termination claims. This ruling underscores that employers cannot use subsequent actions taken by an employee to defend against claims of discrimination or wrongful termination that are based on events that transpired prior to the termination. Essentially, the court emphasized the principle that once an employee has been wrongfully terminated, later discovered misconduct does not mitigate or negate the employer's liability for that wrongful act.

This ruling highlights the importance of maintaining a clear boundary between the reasons for termination and any subsequent behavior exhibited by the employee. By acknowledging that post-termination evidence cannot be used to excuse liability, the case reinforces the concept that employers must be held accountable for their actions and decisions that impact their employees' rights, particularly concerning discriminatory practices.