Professional in Human Resources (PHR) Practice Exam

Question: 1 / 575

What was the significance of the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke ruling?

It nullified racial considerations in college admissions

It allowed race to be a factor in admissions decisions

The significance of the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke ruling lies in its confirmation that race can be a consideration in college admissions decisions, but it also set limitations on how this can be applied. The Supreme Court's decision allowed for the inclusion of race among several factors that could be considered by educational institutions to promote diversity and rectify past discrimination. However, the ruling notably rejected the use of strict racial quotas, thereby emphasizing that while race could enhance efforts to achieve diversity, it could not be the sole factor determining admissions. This nuanced approach has shaped affirmative action policies in higher education, leading to ongoing discussions around race and diversity within admissions processes.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

It mandated equal representation in academic institutions

It established the quota system for admissions

Next Question

Report this question

Download Professional in Human Resources (PHR) Practice Exam PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy